Skip to content
Clear Reels Hub

Could Additional Countries Pursue Australia's Example in Banning Social Platforms for Teenagers Under 16?

The Australian bold move to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are observing closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising number of countries are exploring parallel bans.

  • The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that phones and apps are "robbing our kids' childhood". Legislation could be formalized next year.
  • Norway is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
  • Ireland is working on a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "an measures under consideration".
  • In Spain, the leader has urged parliament to approve a bill increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
  • In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a related action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
  • The authorities in the Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is granted. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" design of these services, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A clear age limit is a good foundation," stated one parliamentarian driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "based on robust data".

Previously, interest built behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. However, the government committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who died after encountering harmful online content suggests that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for minors," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, action is mostly unfolding at the regional level due to federal inaction.

  • The state of Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
  • Florida has signed a law barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
  • Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
  • Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed measures demanding parental consent for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain politicians to follow the Australian path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Beyond the West, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

  • Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
  • Brazil has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, global organizations strike a more measured stance. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

As this international discussion evolves, the steps of Australia and others indicate that states globally are increasingly willing to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.

About the author

Rachel Villarreal

Award-winning video editor with over a decade of experience in digital storytelling and post-production.

Clear Reels Hub

Type to search articles.